The Rangers' Cliff Lee and the Giants' Tim Lincecum dueled in an amazing game of pitching, and lived up to everything both games 1 and 5 were supposed to be. Both had a commanding performance over the other team's lineup, and took a scoreless game into the late innings. Wonderful!
But as the innings unfolded it became clear that the Giants were taking better swings when they made outs than the Rangers were. And as each scoreless inning moved into the late innings, I became more sure that the Giants were going to win. A scoreless game late was unfamiliar territory to the Rangers, while it was home sweet home to the Giants. It was only a matter of time before the Giants bats broke through. Lincecum was simply lights out all game.
When they got two hits in the seventh, and Huff bunted the runners over (the first sacrifice of his career), I could taste it. Although Pat "the Bat" Burrell whiffed, when Renteria came up, Giants radio announcer Dave Flemming called it. "Can Edgar Renteria be the Giants hero yet again?" I have never been so ecstatic over a baseball play in my life as I was for his three run homer. And Flemming's voice cracked like a thirteen year old when he came to the word "gone!" in his call.
After that, Cruz made it interesting with a homer off Timmy Jim, but order was restored the next at bat. I was a bit surprised when Lincecum took the mound for the 8th, but Wilson's appearance in the 9th, no matter how well Timmy was pitching, was the right choice. This time, Wilson made it easy. One, two, three. As has happened so many times before, Wilson faced the 3, 4, 5 batters to close it out. I wouldn't have it any other way. Neither would Wilson.
Final - San Francisco 3, Texas 1
San Francisco wins the World Series 4 games to 1
Friday, November 5, 2010
Monday, November 1, 2010
THE GIANTS WIN THE WORLD SERIES!
IT'S OVER! THE SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS HAVE WON THE WORLD SERIES! WE WIN! NOW IT'S TIME TO PARTY!
Sunday, October 31, 2010
Game 4 Observations
While all his friends went Trick or Treating tonight, 21 year old Madison Bumgarner pitched a three-hit shutout in the World Series against the great Texas Rangers bats. That's two shutouts now against this team.
The Giants had a phenomenal defensive performance behind Bumgarner to bolster the win. But the great glove work started out with Hamilton's diving catch to save the Giants from scoring first. The G-Men turned several double plays, and Cody Ross came close to matching Hamilton's feat later in the game with a sliding catch of his own. Rook Buster Posey gunned down Hamilton in a seemingly sure steal attempt. But the play that sticks out is Freddie Sanchez's robbery of a line drive. Hit over his head, he went high up, landed into a backward somersault, and came up with a sno-cone snag.
The Giants provided all the offense in the game in a blowout. Blowout? Yes, four runs scored by this team is a blowout. Huff's two run bomb, Torres' bouncer off the top of the fence that bounced back into the yard (yes, Ian, he did it too), and Posey's blast added up to an insurmountable lead. Bumgarner was iffy in the 7th, but Bochy left him in for the 8th to face the bottom of the order. The Beard slammed the door shut in the 9th with a 1-2-3 inning.
Final - San Francisco 4, Texas 0
Los Gigantes surge to a 3-1 series lead
The Giants had a phenomenal defensive performance behind Bumgarner to bolster the win. But the great glove work started out with Hamilton's diving catch to save the Giants from scoring first. The G-Men turned several double plays, and Cody Ross came close to matching Hamilton's feat later in the game with a sliding catch of his own. Rook Buster Posey gunned down Hamilton in a seemingly sure steal attempt. But the play that sticks out is Freddie Sanchez's robbery of a line drive. Hit over his head, he went high up, landed into a backward somersault, and came up with a sno-cone snag.
The Giants provided all the offense in the game in a blowout. Blowout? Yes, four runs scored by this team is a blowout. Huff's two run bomb, Torres' bouncer off the top of the fence that bounced back into the yard (yes, Ian, he did it too), and Posey's blast added up to an insurmountable lead. Bumgarner was iffy in the 7th, but Bochy left him in for the 8th to face the bottom of the order. The Beard slammed the door shut in the 9th with a 1-2-3 inning.
Final - San Francisco 4, Texas 0
Los Gigantes surge to a 3-1 series lead
Game 3 Observations
As much as Johnathan Sanchez struggled, the difference in this game was one bad pitch by Sanchez. One pitch. Cruz led off the second with a double, but Sanchez pulled it together the next two batters. Molina was hot, so walking him wasn't a bad outcome if Sanchez were pitching around him. Moreland had a very good at bat, and Sanchez battled back. Moreland slammed the pitch he needed to, deep into the bleachers. This is what a good hitter does. He hits the one pitch he needs to all game long, and that's all it takes at the major league level to win a game.
On the other hand, the Giants have been doing all year long just what Moreland did in game 3, and it has been written off as luck. Could I get away with labeling this Texas Rangers World Series home run as luck? Not a chance. Anyway, the Giants showed signs of getting to the Rangers pitching late in the game, but it was too little, too late. Feliz came in and blew the Giants away in the ninth. The key to the rest of the Series is for the Giants to keep this kid on the bench. The Giants didn't play all that bad, and the Ranger bats showed us what they were capable of doing. Josh Hamilton finally showed up in this series with a solo shot to give the Rangers an insurance run.
Final - Texas 4, San Francisco 2.
Texas cuts San Fran Series lead to 2-1.
On the other hand, the Giants have been doing all year long just what Moreland did in game 3, and it has been written off as luck. Could I get away with labeling this Texas Rangers World Series home run as luck? Not a chance. Anyway, the Giants showed signs of getting to the Rangers pitching late in the game, but it was too little, too late. Feliz came in and blew the Giants away in the ninth. The key to the rest of the Series is for the Giants to keep this kid on the bench. The Giants didn't play all that bad, and the Ranger bats showed us what they were capable of doing. Josh Hamilton finally showed up in this series with a solo shot to give the Rangers an insurance run.
Final - Texas 4, San Francisco 2.
Texas cuts San Fran Series lead to 2-1.
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Game 2 Observations
Okay, another torture game, but only 7 1/2 innings worth. Matt Cain was simply Matt Cain. Zero runs in the post-season. CJ Wilson tossed a really good game, too. Edgar Renteria! This was the pitching matchup everybody expected in game 1. But it got really out of hand in the bottom of the 8th inning. Both the Giants' bats and the Rangers' bullpen did some things out of character for them. And, how does Ron Washington let a guy walk more than one batter in that situation in a close World Series game? That just set up their 9-0 collapse.
I saw a post-game interview with Washington, and he was visibly annoyed at some of the questions. Are the Rangers unraveling? Let's hope so. The Giants need all the opposing team's blunders they can get. But...and this is a large but...the Rangers still have to play their first World Series game at home. Those fans should be absolutely crazy. GO GIANTS!
Final - San Francisco 9, Texas 0
Giants take a 2-0 Series lead
I saw a post-game interview with Washington, and he was visibly annoyed at some of the questions. Are the Rangers unraveling? Let's hope so. The Giants need all the opposing team's blunders they can get. But...and this is a large but...the Rangers still have to play their first World Series game at home. Those fans should be absolutely crazy. GO GIANTS!
Final - San Francisco 9, Texas 0
Giants take a 2-0 Series lead
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Game 1 Observations
Torture. Anti-torture. Game 1 was anti-torture. Torture is when everything comes down to the ninth inning in a one-run game and Wilson lets several runners on before striking the last batter out on a full count. NLCS torture.
Anti-torture is when all of that happens at the beginning of the game. Like when Tim Lincecum has a brain fart and doesn't throw the ball in a run-down. Like when Freddy Sanchez gets doubled off second on a blooper that Bad Vlad simply can't catch. Like when Benjie Molina tries to score on a sac fly, and he's out by ten feet, except that the throw is half way up the first base line. And like when the Giants beat the best playoff pitcher ever to be born by racking up seven runs on him before the fifth inning is over, making sure that there won't be a one-run game. Scary.
What can you say about 18 runs, 25 hits, 6 errors, a double by an AL pitcher setting up Molina scoring on a sac fly, the Giants bullpen giving up 3 runs in the ninth inning in a game started by Lee and Lincecum? This was as bizarre a game as I can remember. Check out this summary by McCovey Chronicles. Giants up 1-0 over the Rangers. Holding my breath, turning purple.
Final - San Francisco 11, Texas 7
San Francisco takes a 1-0 Series lead
Anti-torture is when all of that happens at the beginning of the game. Like when Tim Lincecum has a brain fart and doesn't throw the ball in a run-down. Like when Freddy Sanchez gets doubled off second on a blooper that Bad Vlad simply can't catch. Like when Benjie Molina tries to score on a sac fly, and he's out by ten feet, except that the throw is half way up the first base line. And like when the Giants beat the best playoff pitcher ever to be born by racking up seven runs on him before the fifth inning is over, making sure that there won't be a one-run game. Scary.
What can you say about 18 runs, 25 hits, 6 errors, a double by an AL pitcher setting up Molina scoring on a sac fly, the Giants bullpen giving up 3 runs in the ninth inning in a game started by Lee and Lincecum? This was as bizarre a game as I can remember. Check out this summary by McCovey Chronicles. Giants up 1-0 over the Rangers. Holding my breath, turning purple.
Final - San Francisco 11, Texas 7
San Francisco takes a 1-0 Series lead
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Game 1 Shocker - Giants Defy Odds In World Series
"Nobody had been able to hit Cliff Lee in his playoff career. Game 1 of the World Series was different."
The title of this post, along with the quote above, were the headline and summary on Comcast's homepage story when I logged on tonight. Shocker? Well, if that's what the rest of the world thinks, we've got you where we want you.
Mat Latos, Derek Lowe, Derek Lowe (yes, twice!), Roy Halladay, Cole Hammels, Roy Oswalt, Cliff Lee. These were the dominating pitchers, in order, guaranteed to beat the Giants. They all lost. Is there a pattern here?
The title of this post, along with the quote above, were the headline and summary on Comcast's homepage story when I logged on tonight. Shocker? Well, if that's what the rest of the world thinks, we've got you where we want you.
Mat Latos, Derek Lowe, Derek Lowe (yes, twice!), Roy Halladay, Cole Hammels, Roy Oswalt, Cliff Lee. These were the dominating pitchers, in order, guaranteed to beat the Giants. They all lost. Is there a pattern here?
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Road Warriors
Guess which teams had the two best home records in baseball this year, and in which order? Well, if you don't know, you could figure it out easily by looking at the title of this post. Yup, you guessed it. The Atlanta Braves were #1, followed by the Philadelphia Phillies at #2. And the Giants beat each team on the road in that same order to win the pennant. Games 3 and 4 in Atlanta in the NLDS and games 1 and 6 in Philly in the NLCS. A 4-1 road record vs. awesome home teams.
Saturday, October 23, 2010
THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANT!
The Philadelphia Phillies' dream of being the first team to win three consecutive NL pennants since the 1942-44 Cardinals has been slaughtered by the extreme underdog San Francisco Giants!!!! Juan Uribe hits an 8th inning opposite field home run to put the Giants ahead 3-2. Brian Wilson makes the perfect pitch - a low, backdoor slider - the pitch that awesome slugger Ryan Howard simply cannot hit. Howard was fooled badly, and THE GIANTS WON THE PENNANT! Another extreme form of torture!
The parties are spilling out into the streets! We're going to the World Series! Wahoooo!
The parties are spilling out into the streets! We're going to the World Series! Wahoooo!
Friday, October 22, 2010
No Respect
Well, the Giants aren't getting much respect nationally. Just tonight, MLB Network was doing highlights of the Rangers beating the Yankees to win the AL pennant, and the talking heads started yakking about how the Rangers matched up against the Phillies. Harold Reynolds interrupted the party and inserted, even if a bit hesitantly, "The Giants...may...MAY...win this thing." I know you need to earn your respect, but really.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
SHOCKING!
"Schocking!" That's how MLB network described the Giants' 3-1 NLCS lead over the Phillies. Shocking? To whom is it shocking? Oh, everybody who thought the Phils would roll, that's who.
"Phils in five."
"Uh, I don't know about that. We should give the Giants more credit than that. Phils in six."
Yes, that's the way most of the people "in the know" talked about the series before it began. Neither scenario is possible now. And of course, game 1, where Tim Lincecum outpitched Roy Halladay, was the Giants lone half-expected win.
I simply haven't had time to blog about these games so far, I've been so busy late at night watching highlights from the games I haven't been able to see on TV. Anything can happen on any day in baseball. Anything can happen in October, including the Phils rebounding to win. But the Giants winning the pennant can also happen. And that can happen tonight. GO GIANTS!
"Phils in five."
"Uh, I don't know about that. We should give the Giants more credit than that. Phils in six."
Yes, that's the way most of the people "in the know" talked about the series before it began. Neither scenario is possible now. And of course, game 1, where Tim Lincecum outpitched Roy Halladay, was the Giants lone half-expected win.
I simply haven't had time to blog about these games so far, I've been so busy late at night watching highlights from the games I haven't been able to see on TV. Anything can happen on any day in baseball. Anything can happen in October, including the Phils rebounding to win. But the Giants winning the pennant can also happen. And that can happen tonight. GO GIANTS!
Thursday, October 14, 2010
And The Giants Win...Three Days and Two Nights in Philly
Well, the Giants did it. They beat the Braves in four. It was an intense series, with each game being the only one-run games in all the division series. Now to move on to the NLCS. But what exactly did they win? Baseball has a formal division championship, a formal pennant and a formal world champion. The winner of the division series has no flag, ring, etc. They just get to move on. So with that, the Giants win a three-day, two night trip for 25 to Philadelphia. GO GIANTS!
Monday, October 11, 2010
The Torture Continues
Last month, the Giants announcers described the way the Giants play - and win - as torture. And it has become the team slogan. Torture.
Well, the torture continues. Game 3 gave the fans a severe case of torture yesterday. What amount of torture can you receive when your pitcher tosses a two-hit shutout? Well, if you're leading 4-0 or 6-0 or 10-0, not much. But when almost the entire game has a 1-0 score, it's torture. That means that every single batter the pitcher faces during the whole game is either the potential tying run or the potential go-ahead run. That's torture.
When two pitchers toss two-hit shutouts with 1-0 leads, that's double torture. Lincecum did it in game 1. Sanchez did it for most of game 3. With 2 out and 2 strikes in the bottom of the 8th, and a runner on, the pinch hitter was the potential go-ahead run. And he hit a home run. Torture. If the score had been 5-0 it would have not been a bit deal. Then with 2 strikes and 2 outs in the 9th inning, the Giants one strike away from losing - torture - Freddie Sanchez gets a hit up the middle. Huff drives him in. The Braves make an error. Giants take the lead...for a few minutes anyway. Torture. Then in the bottom of the 9th with a one run lead, Wilson gives up an infield hit to bring the winning run up to the plate. Torture. When Matt Cain pitches a gem, and the bullpen torches it in the 8th inning, that's torture. When Buster Posey hits into a double play in extra innings with the bases loaded instead of driving in the winning run, that's torture.
You know what else is torture? The only one-run games in the whole post-season so far have been every single Giants game.
Well, the torture continues. Game 3 gave the fans a severe case of torture yesterday. What amount of torture can you receive when your pitcher tosses a two-hit shutout? Well, if you're leading 4-0 or 6-0 or 10-0, not much. But when almost the entire game has a 1-0 score, it's torture. That means that every single batter the pitcher faces during the whole game is either the potential tying run or the potential go-ahead run. That's torture.
When two pitchers toss two-hit shutouts with 1-0 leads, that's double torture. Lincecum did it in game 1. Sanchez did it for most of game 3. With 2 out and 2 strikes in the bottom of the 8th, and a runner on, the pinch hitter was the potential go-ahead run. And he hit a home run. Torture. If the score had been 5-0 it would have not been a bit deal. Then with 2 strikes and 2 outs in the 9th inning, the Giants one strike away from losing - torture - Freddie Sanchez gets a hit up the middle. Huff drives him in. The Braves make an error. Giants take the lead...for a few minutes anyway. Torture. Then in the bottom of the 9th with a one run lead, Wilson gives up an infield hit to bring the winning run up to the plate. Torture. When Matt Cain pitches a gem, and the bullpen torches it in the 8th inning, that's torture. When Buster Posey hits into a double play in extra innings with the bases loaded instead of driving in the winning run, that's torture.
You know what else is torture? The only one-run games in the whole post-season so far have been every single Giants game.
Friday, October 8, 2010
Friday Night Quote
You 'n' me ain't - Dizzy Dean
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Wild Card Spells Death of the Great Pennant Races
The Giants and Padres (and Rockies!) just had a great pennant race. The NL West wasn't decided until the last day of the season, and the two teams in the race were playing each other in the final of a three game series. As great as the race was, it was diminished a bit by some bad ball played by both teams. The two teams weren't the greatest. There is, however, another kind of pennant race that is much better.
That kind of race is between two super-teams. Teams that win a lot of games. Upper 90's or 100+ win teams. I was part of one of the greatest pennant races in history. The 1993 race between the Giants and Braves, where each team was tied at 103 wins going into the last game of the season. The Braves completed a season sweep of the Rockies, while the Giants lost to their arch rival Dodgers 12-1, who relished the spoiler role as one of the two greatest rivalries in baseball. They knocked the Giants out of the race. My 400 mile drive home from LA that evening was the longest of my life. I-5 was a trail of thousands of Giants fans that made the trek.
This year had one such hypothetical pennant race. The Yankees and Rays came out of the chute on fire, playing .700-.750 ball in the early part of the season. They were clearly the best two teams in baseball the first half of the season. They were neck and neck all the way down the stretch drive. Going into the last day of the season, they had the same record, just like the Giants and Braves did in '93. The Yankees even played their arch rivals, the Red Sox, on the last weekend of the season, in the other of the two greatest rivalries in baseball, just like the Giants/Braves race. It went down to the last game of the season, just like the Giants/Braves, and the Red Sox beat them to knock the Yankees out of first place, just like the Giants/Braves. It had all the marks of one of the great pennant races in recent memory. Except it wasn't a pennant race. Not even close. Nobody even cared about it. All season long.
The reason is that the race was so great that both teams were going to make the playoffs in the end. There was no race. There's not much difference at all in winning the division and winning the wild card. Maybe a couple of home games in the playoffs. Maybe. It wasn't the exciting Olympic 100 meter finals. It was a meaningless qualifying heat where everybody who is anybody makes it to the finals. In fact, if you look at it from a probability standpoint, the better the record of the two teams, the more likely it is that the second place team will be the wild card. So, the wild card has given an inversely proportional relationship between the greatness of the race and the excitement it creates. It shouldn't have to be this way.
That kind of race is between two super-teams. Teams that win a lot of games. Upper 90's or 100+ win teams. I was part of one of the greatest pennant races in history. The 1993 race between the Giants and Braves, where each team was tied at 103 wins going into the last game of the season. The Braves completed a season sweep of the Rockies, while the Giants lost to their arch rival Dodgers 12-1, who relished the spoiler role as one of the two greatest rivalries in baseball. They knocked the Giants out of the race. My 400 mile drive home from LA that evening was the longest of my life. I-5 was a trail of thousands of Giants fans that made the trek.
This year had one such hypothetical pennant race. The Yankees and Rays came out of the chute on fire, playing .700-.750 ball in the early part of the season. They were clearly the best two teams in baseball the first half of the season. They were neck and neck all the way down the stretch drive. Going into the last day of the season, they had the same record, just like the Giants and Braves did in '93. The Yankees even played their arch rivals, the Red Sox, on the last weekend of the season, in the other of the two greatest rivalries in baseball, just like the Giants/Braves race. It went down to the last game of the season, just like the Giants/Braves, and the Red Sox beat them to knock the Yankees out of first place, just like the Giants/Braves. It had all the marks of one of the great pennant races in recent memory. Except it wasn't a pennant race. Not even close. Nobody even cared about it. All season long.
The reason is that the race was so great that both teams were going to make the playoffs in the end. There was no race. There's not much difference at all in winning the division and winning the wild card. Maybe a couple of home games in the playoffs. Maybe. It wasn't the exciting Olympic 100 meter finals. It was a meaningless qualifying heat where everybody who is anybody makes it to the finals. In fact, if you look at it from a probability standpoint, the better the record of the two teams, the more likely it is that the second place team will be the wild card. So, the wild card has given an inversely proportional relationship between the greatness of the race and the excitement it creates. It shouldn't have to be this way.
Sunday, October 3, 2010
THE GIANTS WIN!
Avoiding catastrophe, the Giants put it together and won the NL West today! Despite losing 12 games (I think) to the Padres this year, they won the last game of the season to be the last team to clinch their division. The Atlanta Braves are coming to town for a rematch of the 2002 NLDS, where the Giants won in surprising fasihion.
GO GIANTS!
GO GIANTS!
Saturday, October 2, 2010
A Giant Collapse?
Well it appears the Giants are in the middle of yet another enormous October collapse. Needing to win only one of the three games (or a fourth tie-breaker, if necessary), Matt Cain was shelled last night. The Padres don't even know how to score six runs in a game, and the pitching staff that led the majors in September ERA since 1965 (1.76) is coughing it up. Today, Barry Zito walked in two runs in the first inning, and was touched for two more by the fourth. Sanchez goes tomorrow.
The ultimate collapse could be to have the Braves lose 2 of 3 to the Phils and tie the Giants/Padres for the wild card. The Giants could lose the division to the Padres in a tie-breaker on Monday and lose the wild card to the Braves in a tie-breaker on Tuesday. Wednesday morning the Giants magic number would still be one, but with no games left to play. It would re-set to 163 for the 2011 season. I just hope one of the most unbelievable collapses in history doesn't happen. If the Braves are swept this weekend, then the Giants will back-door a playoff position no matter how many games they lose. So, Go Phillies!
The ultimate collapse could be to have the Braves lose 2 of 3 to the Phils and tie the Giants/Padres for the wild card. The Giants could lose the division to the Padres in a tie-breaker on Monday and lose the wild card to the Braves in a tie-breaker on Tuesday. Wednesday morning the Giants magic number would still be one, but with no games left to play. It would re-set to 163 for the 2011 season. I just hope one of the most unbelievable collapses in history doesn't happen. If the Braves are swept this weekend, then the Giants will back-door a playoff position no matter how many games they lose. So, Go Phillies!
Friday, October 1, 2010
Magic Number Is One
Well, don't look now, but the Padres have nearly collapsed and the Giants are on a win streak. They play a three game series this weekend, and a fourth tie-breaker in case the Padres sweep. The Giants would need to lose all four for the Padres to win it. I have some excitement, but mostly reserved anticipation. I hope they're not passing out those rally towels at the game tonight in anticipation of the clincher. I was at one of those games in 2000, and the air was full of lint and everybody's eyes were scratchy.
But, here's to a first playoff spot since 2003. It's about time.
But, here's to a first playoff spot since 2003. It's about time.
Giants Win Projection Through September 30
September 16 through September 30, 2010:
W 83-64, 91; L 83-65, 91; L 83-66, 90; W 84-66, 91; W 85-66, 91; L 85-67, 91; W 86-67, 91; W 87-67, 92; L 87-68, 91; W 88-68, 91; W 89-68, 92; W 90-68, 92; W 91-68, 93.
W 83-64, 91; L 83-65, 91; L 83-66, 90; W 84-66, 91; W 85-66, 91; L 85-67, 91; W 86-67, 91; W 87-67, 92; L 87-68, 91; W 88-68, 91; W 89-68, 92; W 90-68, 92; W 91-68, 93.
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Charlie Manuel and the Integrity of the Game
Eyes are on Phillies manager Charlie Manuel this upcoming weekend as they play the Braves to close out the season. The Phils have already clinched the division, but the Braves are fighting for a wild card berth with whoever doesn't win the NL West, the Padres or Giants. There is concern on behalf of the west team that Manuel will juggle his rotation and rest his stars to get ready for the playoffs. This would give the Braves an unfair advantage in the wild card race. The same situation arose several years ago with the Braves' Bobby Cox.
A long standing ethical baseball tradition holds that if you're playing against a team at the end of the season, and that team is in the pennant race, you push your experimentation with your September call-ups aside, and go at the game with your best. This guarantees the other team in the pennant race that things will be fair. This upholds the integrity of the game. And I completely agree with this tradition.
Except in the Phillies' case. Why? Well, traditionally, baseball didn't have divisions. Each league consisted of all teams racing for the same pennant. This meant that only the teams that were no longer in any pennant race at all were facing teams that were. The season no longer mattered to them because they had no shot at the pennant, or a yet to be created division title. When division play came along, however, each division had an even number of teams, and the schedule guaranteed that the last several weeks were played amongst teams in their own divisions. So the tradition of not rolling over against a playoff contender stood.
But then several new developments came on the scene. With AL expansion in '77, and NL expansion in '93, there were no longer an even number of teams in a division. This meant that during the pennant race, there was always at least one series playing between teams of opposite divisions. Then with realignment in '94, a wild card was introduced along with three divisions. Most divisions didn't (and still don't) have an even number of teams. Now, it's guaranteed that teams playing out of their divisions, and against wild card contenders, happens more often. So, we're bound to see this situation occur where a team that has already clinched a playoff spot will play against teams that haven't yet.
But it's also another baseball tradition, albeit one of strategy, to do whatever necessary to get your team ready for the playoffs. Rest stars, juggle rotations, use your call-ups. And traditionally, since that team had already clinched, it meant that no other team they faced was still in a pennant race. They could afford to lose games after clinching, since those games had no importance, whereas the post-season games did.
So, what the addition of a wild card and interdivision play caused by odd numbers of teams within divisions has done is to pit two baseball traditions against each other in a head-to-head fashion. And if you're the team that has already won a spot in the playoffs, your self-interest trumps all others. Period. In essence, what people are calling on Charlie Manuel to do is to jeopardize his team's ability to win the World Series just to satisfy the desires of a team that obviously hasn't played well enough to have already clinched. And that is a ridiculous thing to ask.
The real question about the integrity of the game that should be asked is whether interdivision play at the end of the season and a wild card format are the ideas that compromise the integrity of the game. Even though my Giants could be affected by Manuel's managing decisions this weekend, I realize that it's in his best interest to try to win the World Series in any way possible. I would expect nothing less than for Manuel to tell his critics to shove it, even if those critics were Giants fans and management.
A long standing ethical baseball tradition holds that if you're playing against a team at the end of the season, and that team is in the pennant race, you push your experimentation with your September call-ups aside, and go at the game with your best. This guarantees the other team in the pennant race that things will be fair. This upholds the integrity of the game. And I completely agree with this tradition.
Except in the Phillies' case. Why? Well, traditionally, baseball didn't have divisions. Each league consisted of all teams racing for the same pennant. This meant that only the teams that were no longer in any pennant race at all were facing teams that were. The season no longer mattered to them because they had no shot at the pennant, or a yet to be created division title. When division play came along, however, each division had an even number of teams, and the schedule guaranteed that the last several weeks were played amongst teams in their own divisions. So the tradition of not rolling over against a playoff contender stood.
But then several new developments came on the scene. With AL expansion in '77, and NL expansion in '93, there were no longer an even number of teams in a division. This meant that during the pennant race, there was always at least one series playing between teams of opposite divisions. Then with realignment in '94, a wild card was introduced along with three divisions. Most divisions didn't (and still don't) have an even number of teams. Now, it's guaranteed that teams playing out of their divisions, and against wild card contenders, happens more often. So, we're bound to see this situation occur where a team that has already clinched a playoff spot will play against teams that haven't yet.
But it's also another baseball tradition, albeit one of strategy, to do whatever necessary to get your team ready for the playoffs. Rest stars, juggle rotations, use your call-ups. And traditionally, since that team had already clinched, it meant that no other team they faced was still in a pennant race. They could afford to lose games after clinching, since those games had no importance, whereas the post-season games did.
So, what the addition of a wild card and interdivision play caused by odd numbers of teams within divisions has done is to pit two baseball traditions against each other in a head-to-head fashion. And if you're the team that has already won a spot in the playoffs, your self-interest trumps all others. Period. In essence, what people are calling on Charlie Manuel to do is to jeopardize his team's ability to win the World Series just to satisfy the desires of a team that obviously hasn't played well enough to have already clinched. And that is a ridiculous thing to ask.
The real question about the integrity of the game that should be asked is whether interdivision play at the end of the season and a wild card format are the ideas that compromise the integrity of the game. Even though my Giants could be affected by Manuel's managing decisions this weekend, I realize that it's in his best interest to try to win the World Series in any way possible. I would expect nothing less than for Manuel to tell his critics to shove it, even if those critics were Giants fans and management.
Monday, September 27, 2010
Back In First Place - Again
Yesterday, the Giants won and the Padres lost, allowing the Giants to take first place. Yet again. It seems this has happened a hundred times over the last week. The Giants took two out of three from the Rockies and two out of three from the Cubs before that. But they've lost first place several times, too. The Giants need to figure out that this is a time of season when winning two out of three simply isn't enough. There are four teams striving for two playoff spots. The Giants, Padres and Rockies are all in the division race, and also in the wild card race along with the Braves. Somebody is going to win, and somebody is going to go home. Going home isn't an option.
Over the last three weeks, the Giants pitching staff has been on just about the hottest streak in baseball history. They set a modern record by going 18 consecutive games allowing three runs or less. Yet in the first 16 of those games, they went a meager 10-6. The hitting has been a season-long problem. All these 1-0 games are killing some fingernails out there. It seems that the showdown will be the last weekend of the season between the Giants and Padres. Can this be the year?
Over the last three weeks, the Giants pitching staff has been on just about the hottest streak in baseball history. They set a modern record by going 18 consecutive games allowing three runs or less. Yet in the first 16 of those games, they went a meager 10-6. The hitting has been a season-long problem. All these 1-0 games are killing some fingernails out there. It seems that the showdown will be the last weekend of the season between the Giants and Padres. Can this be the year?
Friday, September 24, 2010
Friday Night Quote
If the World Series goes seven games, it will be NBC's longest running show this fall. - Johnny Carson, The Tonight Show, NBC, 1978
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Blog Bat-round: If I Were Commissioner
[Update: since this blog bat-around was started among the baseball card blogger circles, I'm cross-posting it to my 1974 Topps baseball card blog.]
David at Indians Baseball Cards & Random Wax poses the following question for a blog bat-around:
Baseball has been screwed up under Bud Selig far beyond the average fan's knowledge. I'll expose a number of those dark secrets below and as commissioner, I would make the following changes, unilaterally, on my first day in office:
On the field changes:
Off the field changes:
Legacy will take care of itself.
David at Indians Baseball Cards & Random Wax poses the following question for a blog bat-around:
The topic: With Bud Selig supposedly retiring in 2012 (and assuming the end of the world doesn't follow soon afterward), if YOU were asked to become the next Baseball Commissioner, what would you do? What changes would you like to make, what things would you leave as-is, what would you like to see as your legacy when your retirement time came?
Baseball has been screwed up under Bud Selig far beyond the average fan's knowledge. I'll expose a number of those dark secrets below and as commissioner, I would make the following changes, unilaterally, on my first day in office:
On the field changes:
- Expansion to 32 teams w/ realignment. Either 8 divisions of 4 teams with no wild card, or 4 divisions of 8 teams w/ top two in each. There needs to be the same number of teams in each division. Right now, statistically, the AL West teams have a 50% greater chance of winning the World Series than NL Central teams, just by being in the AL West.
- Use an unbalanced, but symmetrical schedule. Baseball needs each team playing each other team the exact same number of times in division, and same number of games with all teams out of the division, both home and road, from division to division, league to league, and those numbers have to be even numbers. Teams in the same division need to have the same common scheduled teams. Having divisions logically means an unbalanced schedule. Each division needs an even number of teams so that only division play occurs the last weeks of the season.
- Eliminate interleague play. The players hate it. Attendance figures from largely weekend games when school's out and the weather is nice is not evidence that the fans support it either. And the argument that fans never get to see players from the other league is bogus. A majority of baseball fans live either in a metro area that already has one team in each league (the five largest markets - ten teams worth!, NY, LA, Chi, SF, and DC/Balt), or in a metro area that is a short drive from another team in the other league. (Philly, San Diego, Milwaukee, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Detroit, etc.) Interleague play also skews the division race, as schedules are not identical. For too long, the Marlins have skated with playing six games against the hapless Rays while their division rival Mets have played six games against the World Champs. Enough.
- The All-Star game will no longer decide Home Field Advantage in the World Series, and will revert back to alternating HFA between leagues each year. All-Star managers aren't able to focus on winning the game anyway, because two other expectations are more important: a) keeping other managers' pitchers from being injured, and b) making sure every player on an ever enlarging roster makes it into the game. A pinch runner for the batter who pinch hit for the defensive replacement from last inning? Hey, I just put three players into the game in four pitches! That's what the last three innings of the ASG have become.
- Reduce the All-Star rosters to 24 max. and eliminate the "each team has one player" rule. Only one thing is less logical that requiring one player from each team, and that's the argument for it: "It's a fan's game." Uhm, the fans of the other 29 teams don't want to see your least worst player in the ASG when he's batting .279/11/36 at the break. He gets to play just because every other player on your team sucks even worse? And you want him to play in the ASG? Heck, you don't even want to see him play in your own ballpark. If you did, your attendance wouldn't suck so bad. I've lived through plenty of bad A's and Giants seasons where I was actually embarrassed for our representative to be seen in the introductions, not to mention the game.
- Eliminate all the NFL rules that have been adopted into baseball, like the one that made George Steinbrenner an air traffic controller. Get rid of all the NFL tie-breaking, home field advantage and playoff matchup rules. All they do is complicate things and screw playoff ticket holders out of being able to use their tickets effectively. Football has these stupid rules precisely because they have no way to decide things on the field. Using head-to-head as a tie-breaker necessarily means that the winner has a worse record against inferior teams. Hasn't anybody at MLB corporate ever taken logic 101 at their local community college? Home field advantage and matchup rules mean that ticket holders don't even know when the game is and who it's against for the ticket they're holding in their hand. Last year's fiasco that allowed the Yanks (HFA) to choose which ALDS series to play in was a great example. They didn't have to choose until a few hours after the regular season was over. But there was a rain-out makeup on Monday that forced another one-game playoff on Tuesday, still part of the regular season. They got to decide whether to screw the Red Sox in choosing which day they played - hours before their game - or to make the other team play on a couple of hours sleep on the plane while in the air at 35,000 feet.
- Eliminate TV ratings based playoff start times. The Yankees are guaranteed the prime time slot for every game ever, while the rest of the teams play bizarre day games in weird time zones. Every time a series is decided, the remaining series have their time slots revised according to a pecking order of prime time ratings. Several times since this has started, fans of one team with tickets in hand for tomorrow's game have gone to bed not knowing whether the next day's game would be at 1pm or 7pm because an extra inning game in the other league on the opposite coast that was playing past midnight may end that series and effect start times of all other games the next day because the ratings pecking order had to be rearranged. When you're a ticket holder for these games, you may be screwed out of hundreds or thousands of dollars because you can't sell or give away a day game ticket at the last minute. It's happened several times to me personally. Enough.
- Allow each home team to set the time for its own division series playoff games. Not being able to go to or even watch your own team because you're at work and you fell into a day game slot at the last minute just because some dude on the east coast wants to watch it on TV is freaking lame. Let them stay up until 2am. That way, everybody will be able to see it.
- All post season game dates with pre-figured division vs. division arrangement will be made prior to the season.
- Even though I personally don't like the DH, I would keep it for one league. It's good for baseball because it is good at starting and keeping arguments going. But the current DH rule gives the AL team an advantage in the World Series. It gets to keep using its full-time, season long hitting specialist, while the NL team must scrape a utility player off the bench for its DH. If you don't agree, please tell me you'd rather see Lee Lacy hit than Reggie Jackson. After the last game of the regular season, I would give all the NL teams the option to draft one free agent AL DH player to use as their DH in the World Series, just to even things up.
Off the field changes:
- Lifetime bans would extend only to the lifetime of the player. For example, once he died, Shoeless Joe would be in the HOF.
- Change the territorial rights boundary from a distance based boundary (75 miles) to a population based one. The existing rule guarantees the Yankees an untouchable fan base of 25 million. Even though San Jose is 40 miles further from San Francisco than Oakland is, the Giants territorial rights can stop an A's move to SJ. Why? If small market teams have problems making ends meet, they can move to Brooklyn and/or East Rutherford, Chicago, San Bernardino, San Fernando, or San Jose.
- Holding the dubious distinction as the only person to have the steroids scandal occur right under his nose both as an owner and as a commissioner; and holding the dubious distinction as a commissioner who wouldn't even stand up in recognition that the greatest record in sports was just tied, and also in reference to the other 12 reasons listed above, my last act on the first day in office will be to impose a lifetime ban from baseball upon Bud Selig.
- Most everything else.
Legacy will take care of itself.
Giants Win Projection Through September 15
September 1 through September 15:
W 74-60, 89; L 74-61, 89; W 75-61, 89; W 76-61, 90; W 77-61, 90; W 78-61, 91; L 78-62, 90; W 79-62, 91; W 80-62, 91; L 80-63, 91; W 81-63, 91; L 81-64, 90; W 82-64, 91.
W 74-60, 89; L 74-61, 89; W 75-61, 89; W 76-61, 90; W 77-61, 90; W 78-61, 91; L 78-62, 90; W 79-62, 91; W 80-62, 91; L 80-63, 91; W 81-63, 91; L 81-64, 90; W 82-64, 91.
Friday, September 17, 2010
Friday Night Quote
It ain't braggin' if you can back it up. - Dizzy Dean
FIRST PLACE!
Okay, we did it! The Giants beat the Dodgers while the Padres lost to the Cardinals. This is the first day the Giants have been in first place in September since 2003. Terribly sad fact. But, first place is only good if you're there after the regular season is over. So, let's Go Giants!
Since 2003, the Giants have obviously been the least effective team in the NL West. Every single other team in the division has at least one post-season appearance since the Giants last did. In those last six years, NL West teams have won three wild card positions. The Dodgers won the division in 2004, '08 & '09, the Padres in 2005, '06, the Diamondbacks in 2007. The Dodgers took the wild card in 2006, the Rockies and Padres tied for it in 2007 and the Rox won the playoff game, and the Rockies again in 2009. So, in total, the four other teams have combined for nine playoff positions in the last six years, including one tie, and an all-NL West NLCS in 2007. No Giants.
The Giants, on the other hand, had a total collapse in 2004 in the last weekend of the season, and in 2009 were the only team of 8 teams in baseball in a playoff position at the All-Star break that didn't hold on in the second half. Their 2005-08 seasons were abysmal.
I hope this leap into first place is the beginning of three consecutive World Championships and seven in the next fifteen years, to bring the winningest team in baseball history up to the law of averages.
Since 2003, the Giants have obviously been the least effective team in the NL West. Every single other team in the division has at least one post-season appearance since the Giants last did. In those last six years, NL West teams have won three wild card positions. The Dodgers won the division in 2004, '08 & '09, the Padres in 2005, '06, the Diamondbacks in 2007. The Dodgers took the wild card in 2006, the Rockies and Padres tied for it in 2007 and the Rox won the playoff game, and the Rockies again in 2009. So, in total, the four other teams have combined for nine playoff positions in the last six years, including one tie, and an all-NL West NLCS in 2007. No Giants.
The Giants, on the other hand, had a total collapse in 2004 in the last weekend of the season, and in 2009 were the only team of 8 teams in baseball in a playoff position at the All-Star break that didn't hold on in the second half. Their 2005-08 seasons were abysmal.
I hope this leap into first place is the beginning of three consecutive World Championships and seven in the next fifteen years, to bring the winningest team in baseball history up to the law of averages.
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Giants Fans Invade San Diego
One of the things I've always hated is to have numerous fans of the visiting team show up and act like they own the place. You know, Yankee fans, Dodger fans, Red Sox fans, Cubs fans. They're big market teams with huge followings, transplants, and travelling fans. Often over the years, the Oakland Coliseum has had many a game where A's fans were outnumbered by Yankee or Red Sox fans, and Giants fans since interleague play started.
Well, the Giants have a national following, too, just not quite as big as the Yankees or Red Sox. But one place we always show up in massive numbers is San Diego. Transplants, college students, and cheap Southwest Airlines tickets. This four game series vs. the Pads was no exception. Thousands showed up and hijacked the crowd noise this weekend. And Padres fans hate it.
You simply can't listen to the game and tell who just made the big play. Today I was fooled by Tim Lincecum's two run single. The crowd erupted in a roar, and I thought, "Oops, the Padres are coming back." No, it was the Giants fans.
I've seen the Giants on the road in LA, San Diego, Oakland, Colorado and Arizona. It's amazing how many show up, and how many cheer all the louder because they know they're on the road. The first interleague game in Oakland between the Giants and A's back in '97 was about two-thirds Giants fans, and it was louder and more rowdy than most every game I've ever seen in San Fran.
Thanks to the fans who showed up this weekend and cheered the Orange and Black to three out of four to tie for first place.
Well, the Giants have a national following, too, just not quite as big as the Yankees or Red Sox. But one place we always show up in massive numbers is San Diego. Transplants, college students, and cheap Southwest Airlines tickets. This four game series vs. the Pads was no exception. Thousands showed up and hijacked the crowd noise this weekend. And Padres fans hate it.
You simply can't listen to the game and tell who just made the big play. Today I was fooled by Tim Lincecum's two run single. The crowd erupted in a roar, and I thought, "Oops, the Padres are coming back." No, it was the Giants fans.
I've seen the Giants on the road in LA, San Diego, Oakland, Colorado and Arizona. It's amazing how many show up, and how many cheer all the louder because they know they're on the road. The first interleague game in Oakland between the Giants and A's back in '97 was about two-thirds Giants fans, and it was louder and more rowdy than most every game I've ever seen in San Fran.
Thanks to the fans who showed up this weekend and cheered the Orange and Black to three out of four to tie for first place.
Friday, September 10, 2010
Friday Night Quote
For fourteen years I had the best seat in baseball. - Willie McCovey, speaking about his spot in the on-deck circle while Willie Mays was at bat.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Fan Ejected By Ump For Heckling
I'm sure this ain't the first time, but a fan was ejected from a game by umpire Bob Davidson for heckling a player. Sean Ottow, a Brewer fan, was heckling Cardinals' catcher Yadier Molina. Davidson had a mean streak already going in ejecting a number of players and managers that game, so a fan was what was needed to complete the day. Maybe that counts for "hitting for the cycle" in umpire dialect. Maybe ejecting a fan is like that final triple needed.
I found two brief accounts of the incident here and here. One thing the fan claimed is that he never swore at Molina. But, he was cited for disorderly conduct by the police.
I'm wondering what he said and for how long. I've also had extended time periods of heckling players - like nine innings a day over a four game series - and I've never been ejected. But maybe it's like my friend Mike says, we'd be tossed in jail today for some of the things we said back in the 80's. I'm also wondering if his citation was a direct result of being tossed by the ump. Would he have been cited if the ump never tossed him? And since he got a standing ovation from the crowd, one wonders how disorderly he actually was. They all seemed to enjoy him. Now for a serious question. Will he be banned from future Brewers games by management? Loss of season tickets? Could any of this happen to a fan simply because an ump had a bad day? What role can a player have in getting a fan tossed? One time, I was heckling a rookie and he called time out and jogged in to the third base ump and pointed out at me. The ump shrugged his shoulders, and then he really caught it from the whole bleacher section for the rest of the game.
It will be interesting to see if this is the last thing to be heard on this incident.
I found two brief accounts of the incident here and here. One thing the fan claimed is that he never swore at Molina. But, he was cited for disorderly conduct by the police.
I'm wondering what he said and for how long. I've also had extended time periods of heckling players - like nine innings a day over a four game series - and I've never been ejected. But maybe it's like my friend Mike says, we'd be tossed in jail today for some of the things we said back in the 80's. I'm also wondering if his citation was a direct result of being tossed by the ump. Would he have been cited if the ump never tossed him? And since he got a standing ovation from the crowd, one wonders how disorderly he actually was. They all seemed to enjoy him. Now for a serious question. Will he be banned from future Brewers games by management? Loss of season tickets? Could any of this happen to a fan simply because an ump had a bad day? What role can a player have in getting a fan tossed? One time, I was heckling a rookie and he called time out and jogged in to the third base ump and pointed out at me. The ump shrugged his shoulders, and then he really caught it from the whole bleacher section for the rest of the game.
It will be interesting to see if this is the last thing to be heard on this incident.
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Giants Win Projection Through August 31
August 16 through August 31, 2010:
L 67-53, 90; L 67-54, 90; W 68-54, 90; W 69-54, 91; L 69-55, 90; L 69-56, 89; W 70-56, 90; W 71-56, 91; L 71-57, 90; L 71-58, 89; L 71-59, 88; W 72-59, 89; L 72-60, 88; W 73-60, 89.
L 67-53, 90; L 67-54, 90; W 68-54, 90; W 69-54, 91; L 69-55, 90; L 69-56, 89; W 70-56, 90; W 71-56, 91; L 71-57, 90; L 71-58, 89; L 71-59, 88; W 72-59, 89; L 72-60, 88; W 73-60, 89.
Sunday, September 5, 2010
The Death of Mannywood
Baseball got some news this week as Manny Ramirez joined the Chicago White Sox. Then it got some more news as the White Sox strolled into Boston to mark a Manny return to Fenway. But a special extra bit to tack on to the end of that story was found in Chavez Ravine.
You see, the Giants and Dodgers re-engaged their historic rivalry on Friday. But, contrary to last year and the end of '08, Manny wasn't a factor. A couple of months ago it was reported that the Mannywood ads were taken off of LA freeway billboards, a sad prelude to the start of this series. A great Dodger to hate, as we haven't had many of those in recent years, Manny served as a target to silence, but even if he hit some homers, beating the Dodgers could silence those. But the eerie silence this weekend almost spoke of a sad end to an era, even though there was the big news of the week. Manny didn't matter enough to the Dodgers to matter in the rivalry with us. Mannywood is dead.
You see, the Giants and Dodgers re-engaged their historic rivalry on Friday. But, contrary to last year and the end of '08, Manny wasn't a factor. A couple of months ago it was reported that the Mannywood ads were taken off of LA freeway billboards, a sad prelude to the start of this series. A great Dodger to hate, as we haven't had many of those in recent years, Manny served as a target to silence, but even if he hit some homers, beating the Dodgers could silence those. But the eerie silence this weekend almost spoke of a sad end to an era, even though there was the big news of the week. Manny didn't matter enough to the Dodgers to matter in the rivalry with us. Mannywood is dead.
Beat LA!
Okay, what a game last night. Yet another classic Giants/Dodgers rivalry game. Before the game I heard that Dodger pitcher Ted Lilly had one of the lowest run support totals in baseball lately. And Giant Matt Cain has one of the lowest totals in his career. So, I assumed that either it would be a scoreless game until the bullpens took over, or the Giants would stay true to their course of a complete lack of run support for Cain while giving it up for Lilly. It turns out I was 3/4 right (right about no run support for Cain {=1/2 point} and half right about one bullpen giving it up {=1/4 point}).
Down 4-0, the Giants hit four homers, one solo in the 7th, back-to-back solos in the 8th and a 2-run Jack in the 9th by Juan UUUUUU-ribe in the 9th to win. Of course, Brian Wilson did his usual bungee jump save, where the the cord pulls you back up just before you crash into the rocks below.
As noted by Mrs. Scott: It's difficult to listen to Giants/Dodgers games due to the number of opposing team's fans cheering for the visiting team. A huge cheer doesn't guarantee it's for the home team.
Rubber game tonight is a must win for the Gyro's, as the Padres keep losing.
Down 4-0, the Giants hit four homers, one solo in the 7th, back-to-back solos in the 8th and a 2-run Jack in the 9th by Juan UUUUUU-ribe in the 9th to win. Of course, Brian Wilson did his usual bungee jump save, where the the cord pulls you back up just before you crash into the rocks below.
As noted by Mrs. Scott: It's difficult to listen to Giants/Dodgers games due to the number of opposing team's fans cheering for the visiting team. A huge cheer doesn't guarantee it's for the home team.
Rubber game tonight is a must win for the Gyro's, as the Padres keep losing.
Friday, September 3, 2010
Friday Night Quote
I don't know how our folks come off callin' this the "Game of the Week." There's a much better game - Dodgers and Giants - over on NBC. - Dizzy Dean, broadcasting on CBS Television
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Stephen Strasburg's Arm, RIP
The hottest prospect in recent memory just blew his elbow out and will require Tommy John surgery. This carries a 12-18 month rehab time. Strasburg has been just about the biggest story of the year. I'm really sorry to hear this happen to such a young, bright star.
What interests me most about this story is that some people predicted this would happen. Curt Schilling apparently did, and I heard an audio clip of a radio interview from earlier in the year of Chris Lincecum (father of Tim, and master mechanics planner of his delivery, who has his own show on in San Fran) saying he witnessed some problems with Strasburg's mechanics and wasn't very confident of his future health. Now, I'm no expert on pitching mechanics. But I'm wondering what was going on in the minds of the Nationals' people, especially given that others were concerned. Were there issues? Were they in the process of being addressed? Is the topic of mechanics widely understood within baseball? Is it merely a matter of opinion with several radically different schools of thought? Are most baseball people clueless with only a few experts on the topic?
I don't know. But it's sad for Strasburg, his family and the Nationals, not to mention the game of baseball. I hope he recovers fully and has a hall of fame career.
What interests me most about this story is that some people predicted this would happen. Curt Schilling apparently did, and I heard an audio clip of a radio interview from earlier in the year of Chris Lincecum (father of Tim, and master mechanics planner of his delivery, who has his own show on in San Fran) saying he witnessed some problems with Strasburg's mechanics and wasn't very confident of his future health. Now, I'm no expert on pitching mechanics. But I'm wondering what was going on in the minds of the Nationals' people, especially given that others were concerned. Were there issues? Were they in the process of being addressed? Is the topic of mechanics widely understood within baseball? Is it merely a matter of opinion with several radically different schools of thought? Are most baseball people clueless with only a few experts on the topic?
I don't know. But it's sad for Strasburg, his family and the Nationals, not to mention the game of baseball. I hope he recovers fully and has a hall of fame career.
Friday, August 27, 2010
Friday Night Quote
A lot of people my age are dead at the present time. - Casey Stengel, at age 75
Saturday, August 21, 2010
Coming Soon: Friday Night Quote
I love baseball quotes, so I thought I would include a quote each Friday night, at 7:35pm. Pacific time, that is. Baseball quotes have a way of telling stories all their own, and also serve to show the game's characters for their strange views of the pastime. Next Friday will be the first installment.
Friday, August 20, 2010
Giants Win Projection Through August 15
August 1 through August 15, 2010:
W 61-45, 93; W 62-45, 94; L 62-46, 93; L 62-47, 92; W 63-47, 93; L 63-48, 92; L 63-49, 91; W 64-49, 92; L 64-50, 91; W 65-50, 92; W 66-50, 92; L 66-51, 91; W 67-51, 92; L 67-52, 91.
W 61-45, 93; W 62-45, 94; L 62-46, 93; L 62-47, 92; W 63-47, 93; L 63-48, 92; L 63-49, 91; W 64-49, 92; L 64-50, 91; W 65-50, 92; W 66-50, 92; L 66-51, 91; W 67-51, 92; L 67-52, 91.
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Bobby Thomson, RIP
Bobby Thomson, the former Giants player who hit the most famous home run in baseball history, died yesterday at the age of 86. His "Shot Heard 'Round The World" off of Dodger pitcher Ralph Branca ended the greatest pennant race in history between the two fiercest rivals in history in the media capitol of the world. That's probably why it's so famous. It's also the most famous radio broadcast in sports history, called by Giants announcer Russ Hodges.
On August 11, 1951, the New York Giants were 13 1/2 games behind their cross-town rivals the Brooklyn Dodgers. The Giants won 37 of their last 44 games to tie the Dodgers for first place on the last day of the regular season, forcing a three game playoff for the pennant. The teams split the first two games, and the Dodgers had a 4-1 lead in the ninth inning of game 3. The Giants started a rally, and after closing the score to 4-2, Thomson came to bat with two runners on base. Two pitches later, history was made.
Here's a video of the home run as shown on Best Damn Sports Show Period. It was edited down, very unfortunately, to fit their show, and due to copyright reasons, I'm guessing, the unedited version just doesn't show up on the internet. Also, there is a story and a video clip on mlb.com that shows a bit more of what happened after the traditional recording of Russ Hodges' call ends. Then for further listening pleasure, a video of Hall of Fame broadcasters Ernie Harwell and Red Barber on their TV coverage of that game.
A strange twist to this home run changed the way sports broadcasts were handled from then on. Recordings of radio broadcasts of great events simply weren't done in those days. But a Dodger fan got out his tape recorder in the last inning of a would-be Dodger victory and made a recording of what he thought would be Hodges' lament over a Giants defeat, just to rub it in the face of Giants fans. Here's a blog article dealing with that history. All in all, a great homer by a true gentleman.
Trivia question: What rookie was on deck when Thomson hit his famous homer?
On August 11, 1951, the New York Giants were 13 1/2 games behind their cross-town rivals the Brooklyn Dodgers. The Giants won 37 of their last 44 games to tie the Dodgers for first place on the last day of the regular season, forcing a three game playoff for the pennant. The teams split the first two games, and the Dodgers had a 4-1 lead in the ninth inning of game 3. The Giants started a rally, and after closing the score to 4-2, Thomson came to bat with two runners on base. Two pitches later, history was made.
Here's a video of the home run as shown on Best Damn Sports Show Period. It was edited down, very unfortunately, to fit their show, and due to copyright reasons, I'm guessing, the unedited version just doesn't show up on the internet. Also, there is a story and a video clip on mlb.com that shows a bit more of what happened after the traditional recording of Russ Hodges' call ends. Then for further listening pleasure, a video of Hall of Fame broadcasters Ernie Harwell and Red Barber on their TV coverage of that game.
A strange twist to this home run changed the way sports broadcasts were handled from then on. Recordings of radio broadcasts of great events simply weren't done in those days. But a Dodger fan got out his tape recorder in the last inning of a would-be Dodger victory and made a recording of what he thought would be Hodges' lament over a Giants defeat, just to rub it in the face of Giants fans. Here's a blog article dealing with that history. All in all, a great homer by a true gentleman.
Trivia question: What rookie was on deck when Thomson hit his famous homer?
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Benjie Mowina
Okay, game one of the 2010 World Series in San Francisco and they're announcing the starting lineups and extras. Renel announces Rangers catcher Benjie Molina. What do the Giant fans do? Cheer? Boo? Remain silent?
Although our five year old's favorite player is Tim Lincecum, he loves to play catcher in pee-wee ball. Molina (pronounced Mowina) has been his favorite catcher. This year he made the pee-wee All-star team, and chose uniform number 1 to wear in honor of Molina. He got to catch a few innings, throwing his arms up and yelling, "YES!" when the manager asked him to catch. Although he's very small, with the gear on he resembles Molina. I would be okay with a Giants/Rangers World Series, and I'm sure our son would be too.
Although our five year old's favorite player is Tim Lincecum, he loves to play catcher in pee-wee ball. Molina (pronounced Mowina) has been his favorite catcher. This year he made the pee-wee All-star team, and chose uniform number 1 to wear in honor of Molina. He got to catch a few innings, throwing his arms up and yelling, "YES!" when the manager asked him to catch. Although he's very small, with the gear on he resembles Molina. I would be okay with a Giants/Rangers World Series, and I'm sure our son would be too.
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Instant Replay Proposal
I have a proposal for the testing of instant replay in baseball. Okay, we already have instant replay for home run calls, but there are cries for more.
My proposal may seem a bit extreme, but I think it would give a good flavor for what we could expect. For a specific introductory period, let's institute full blown instant replay review, including balls and strikes, with unlimited challenges given to each manager during Yankees-Red Sox games only. If it is successful, then we could apply it to the rest of baseball on a permanent basis.
My proposal may seem a bit extreme, but I think it would give a good flavor for what we could expect. For a specific introductory period, let's institute full blown instant replay review, including balls and strikes, with unlimited challenges given to each manager during Yankees-Red Sox games only. If it is successful, then we could apply it to the rest of baseball on a permanent basis.
Blown Calls, Official Scoring and Perfect Games
Blown calls by umpires have been in the news quite a bit this year. Blown calls that have literally cost games - and in the worst situation imaginable - a perfect game on the last out. This has quite naturally stirred debate about instant replay. Armando Galarraga was rooked out of a perfect game by a blown call on the last out. In another situation, the Giants scored the winning run in the bottom of the ninth vs. the Mets a few weeks ago, only to have the home plate ump blow the call by five miles and call the runner out. The Mets won in extra innings. The call literally cost the Giants the game. Not that it weighed heavily in helping them lose the game. The winning run had already crossed the plate before being called out.
I was wondering this last week how an official scorer deals with blown calls by umpires. They have to come up with reasons as to why a play was a hit or error, wild pitch or passed ball. Would the runner have been out? Should the catcher have stopped the pitch with ordinary effort? But what of a blown call where the scorer has to make a decision? If a safe runner is called out, a scorekeeper can give a putout and assist. What if the reverse happens? Does the scorer have to give the batter a hit, even though he was out?
As soon as I saw the Galarraga/Joyce replay, I wondered if the official scorer could have ruled an error on the play, at least preserving a no-hitter, as a way to "make up" for the blown call. It was a difficult play, first baseman coming off the bag to get the ball and the pitcher covering. The first baseman has to hit a moving target in the pitcher while timing his arrival at first base. Those two players have practiced that play thousands of times a year since they were eight years old. It's common for a pitcher to stutter step if the throw isn't quite right and miss the bag with his feet. A throwing error can happen easily.
So why, especially given that the official scorer was tied to covering Tiger baseball in some way, could he not have scored an error? He could have given an error to the first baseman. Or maybe to the pitcher as a way to say "here's the price for your no-hitter." The umpire gives no reason as to why he ruled the runner safe. A number of things could have happened in his mind. He could have beat the throw. The pitcher could have missed the bag, or he could have bobbled the ball. We don't know at the time the play happened. So why could not a scorer have ruled in the same manner? A throwing error with a no-hitter going in the books one batter later would be preferable to giving the batter a hit, knowing that he never got one to begin with.
I was wondering this last week how an official scorer deals with blown calls by umpires. They have to come up with reasons as to why a play was a hit or error, wild pitch or passed ball. Would the runner have been out? Should the catcher have stopped the pitch with ordinary effort? But what of a blown call where the scorer has to make a decision? If a safe runner is called out, a scorekeeper can give a putout and assist. What if the reverse happens? Does the scorer have to give the batter a hit, even though he was out?
As soon as I saw the Galarraga/Joyce replay, I wondered if the official scorer could have ruled an error on the play, at least preserving a no-hitter, as a way to "make up" for the blown call. It was a difficult play, first baseman coming off the bag to get the ball and the pitcher covering. The first baseman has to hit a moving target in the pitcher while timing his arrival at first base. Those two players have practiced that play thousands of times a year since they were eight years old. It's common for a pitcher to stutter step if the throw isn't quite right and miss the bag with his feet. A throwing error can happen easily.
So why, especially given that the official scorer was tied to covering Tiger baseball in some way, could he not have scored an error? He could have given an error to the first baseman. Or maybe to the pitcher as a way to say "here's the price for your no-hitter." The umpire gives no reason as to why he ruled the runner safe. A number of things could have happened in his mind. He could have beat the throw. The pitcher could have missed the bag, or he could have bobbled the ball. We don't know at the time the play happened. So why could not a scorer have ruled in the same manner? A throwing error with a no-hitter going in the books one batter later would be preferable to giving the batter a hit, knowing that he never got one to begin with.
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Giants Win Projection Through July 31
July 15 through July 31, 2010:
W 48-41, 87; W 49-41, 88; W 50-41, 89; L 50-42, 88; W 51-42, 89; W 52-42, 90; L 52-43, 89; W 53-43, 89; W 54-43, 90; W 55-43, 91; W 56-43, 92; L 56-44, 91; W 57-44, 91; W 58-44, 92; L 58-45, 91; W 59-45, 92; W 60-45, 93.
Friday, July 30, 2010
1974 Topps Set - My New Baseball Card Blog
I have a new blog I just started, 1974 Topps Set. This blog is chronicling my collection of 1974 Topps cards. Although I started collecting in 1971, the '74 set is the first I went wild on, when I was just ten. I'm scanning each card in my set, and I have nearly all of them. If you enjoy baseball cards, take a look.
Friday, July 23, 2010
Giants Win Projection Through July 14
July 15 is the start of the second half after the All-Star break, so I'll backup to play through Sunday, July 11.
July 1 through July 11, 2010:
L 40-38, 83; L 40-39, 82; W 41-39, 83; L 41-40, 82; W 42-40, 83; W 43-40, 84; W 44-40, 85; W 45-40, 86; L 45-41, 85; W 46-41, 86; W 47-41, 87.
At the All-Star break, the Giants are in 4th place, 4 games behind San Diego.
July 1 through July 11, 2010:
L 40-38, 83; L 40-39, 82; W 41-39, 83; L 41-40, 82; W 42-40, 83; W 43-40, 84; W 44-40, 85; W 45-40, 86; L 45-41, 85; W 46-41, 86; W 47-41, 87.
At the All-Star break, the Giants are in 4th place, 4 games behind San Diego.
Catching Up
Okay, I haven't been able to catch up with what I've wanted to write. Long time Yankee PA announcer Bob Sheppard died just before the All-Star break. (I believe it's his voice announcing Roger Maris as number nine that is immortalized on the Beatles White Album) George Steinbrenner died just before the All-Star game. The National League won the game. The first half of the season was wrapped up. I was at Tim Lincecum's complete game shutout vs. the Mets. All of this I missed writing about. I still haven't dealt completely with Jason's question about instant replay in light of the perfect game blunder. Oh, and I still need to do the Giants win projection post for July 15. I better get writing.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Classic Rivalry Game, or, Don Mattingly for Manager of the Year
Last night's game between the Giants and Dodgers at Dodger Stadium was a classic rivalry game. It had all the marks of those games you don't see anywhere else with any other opponent. A promising pitching matchup between Lincecum and Kershaw turned into a beanball war, ejections and a bizarre rulebook application that led to the game winning hit in the 9th inning.
The Dodgers had a commanding 5-1 lead, but the Giants chipped away. A previous beanball war from April was resurrected, and three Dodgers were ejected. The bench coach, then Kershaw and Torre (the manager gets ejected after warnings are issued), leaving hitting coach Don Mattingly at the acting manager. Then in the 9th after the Giants got runners on 2nd and 3rd and Johnathan Broxton intentionally walking the bases loaded to set up a double play (the Giants were down by one), Mattingly paid a visit to the mound. As he left, James Loney asked him a question, prompting Mattingly to turn back around to the mound. But, as the rules state, once a manager leaves the dirt circle, that concludes his trip to the mound. Brucy Bochy alertly caught this, and called it to the attention of the umpires. The umps ruled that Mattingly turning around and stepping back on the mound was his second trip. Broxton was removed from the game, and since there was nobody warming up in the Dodger bullpen, a reliever had to enter the game without any warmups! Andres Torres followed up with a double off the wall, and the Giants took the lead and held on. See the video of Mattingly's rookie blunder here.
What a game. I just love it when the Dodgers melt down in such a huge matchup. I wish I were there in LA to see it, full Giants gear, letting the Dodger Stadium faithful know who screwed up.
The Dodgers had a commanding 5-1 lead, but the Giants chipped away. A previous beanball war from April was resurrected, and three Dodgers were ejected. The bench coach, then Kershaw and Torre (the manager gets ejected after warnings are issued), leaving hitting coach Don Mattingly at the acting manager. Then in the 9th after the Giants got runners on 2nd and 3rd and Johnathan Broxton intentionally walking the bases loaded to set up a double play (the Giants were down by one), Mattingly paid a visit to the mound. As he left, James Loney asked him a question, prompting Mattingly to turn back around to the mound. But, as the rules state, once a manager leaves the dirt circle, that concludes his trip to the mound. Brucy Bochy alertly caught this, and called it to the attention of the umpires. The umps ruled that Mattingly turning around and stepping back on the mound was his second trip. Broxton was removed from the game, and since there was nobody warming up in the Dodger bullpen, a reliever had to enter the game without any warmups! Andres Torres followed up with a double off the wall, and the Giants took the lead and held on. See the video of Mattingly's rookie blunder here.
What a game. I just love it when the Dodgers melt down in such a huge matchup. I wish I were there in LA to see it, full Giants gear, letting the Dodger Stadium faithful know who screwed up.
Monday, July 19, 2010
Brian Wilson's 4-34-1 Approach to Getting A Save
Giants closer Brian Wilson has what I call a 4-34-1 approach to pitching. The numbers I mentioned have to do with the 9th inning breakdown of pitches. There are three distinct divisions in his closing inning. Each number is how many pitches he throws in the respective division. The first division is the first four pitches he throws. In sequence they are: out, out, strike, strike. This leaves him with two out and two strikes, just one pitch from a save.
The next 34 pitches are an assortment of walks, hits and runs that cut the Giants' lead to just one run, loads the bases, and takes the count full, with the winning run on second.
The last pitch is strike three to secure a Giants victory.
The next 34 pitches are an assortment of walks, hits and runs that cut the Giants' lead to just one run, loads the bases, and takes the count full, with the winning run on second.
The last pitch is strike three to secure a Giants victory.
Sunday, July 18, 2010
How To Heckle Jason Bay and Others Who Wear #44
I sat in the front row of the left field bleachers a few nights ago at the Giants game vs. the Mets. The Mets left fielder was Jason Bay, and he was wearing that special uniform number, 44. Forty four is a special number because of the hall of fame sluggers that have worn it in the past. Hank Aaron wore it and was a great young player. Willie McCovey, being from the same hometown of Mobile, Alabama, wore it when he broke in with the Giants because Aaron was his idol. McCovey was a rookie in 1959, five years after Aaron. Later, in the 70's, Reggie Jackson adopted the number when he signed with the Yankees. He kept it with the Angels and during his last year back with the A's.
Forty four is one of those hallowed numbers that players respect. Players know who has worn it in the past. So when a player takes 44, he's treading on ground that demands something from him. He needs to turn out to be a superstar.
So, the heckling line is this: "Hey, 44, who do you think you are? There's Hank Aaron, Willie McCovey, Reggie Jackson, and you?"
Jason Bay heard it from a #44 apologist.
Forty four is one of those hallowed numbers that players respect. Players know who has worn it in the past. So when a player takes 44, he's treading on ground that demands something from him. He needs to turn out to be a superstar.
So, the heckling line is this: "Hey, 44, who do you think you are? There's Hank Aaron, Willie McCovey, Reggie Jackson, and you?"
Jason Bay heard it from a #44 apologist.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Busy Week Fer Sure
This was such a busy week I didn't have time to post about Bob Sheppard passing away, or about George Steinbrenner passing away, or about the home run derby, or about the All-Star game... or about the Giants win projection through July 15. Things happen so fast in the blog world that Sunday is passe. Maybe I'll give it a shot this week.
Friday, July 2, 2010
Tradition, The Human Element and Instant Replay (1)
The blown call on the last out of a perfect game that took a perfect game away from a pitcher has given new fuel to the instant replay debate. The call took a perfect game away from the pitcher because the perfect game was already completed when the call was made. The ball beat the runner to first base. The runner was out, but the ump called him safe after the play was made.
The big part of the debate is over the human element of the game. I'm glad that baseball has taken the "get it right" attitude on the field where other umpires can meet to review their own take on a play rather than let the offending umpire stew forever in his mistake. This allowance for an umpire conference upholds the human element - a traditional element at that - of the game. Baseball realizes that it is possible for human error, and also recognized that human error can be corrected on the spot. I wonder whether the other three umps could have overruled the erring ump to preserve the perfecto? Also, could the scorekeeper have, judging that the throw actually beat the runner, ruled the play an error on either the pitcher or first baseman to at least preserve a no-hitter? Would this not be included in the human element of the game?
But one thing baseball also recognizes is that some games or moments are more important than others. Not every play during every season has the same importance. For example, extra umpires are added down the foul lines for post-season and All-Star games, and extras are at the park just in case. Regular season games allow for ill or injured umpires to leave the game and go with three. I'll bring this difference of importance into another post coming soon.
The big part of the debate is over the human element of the game. I'm glad that baseball has taken the "get it right" attitude on the field where other umpires can meet to review their own take on a play rather than let the offending umpire stew forever in his mistake. This allowance for an umpire conference upholds the human element - a traditional element at that - of the game. Baseball realizes that it is possible for human error, and also recognized that human error can be corrected on the spot. I wonder whether the other three umps could have overruled the erring ump to preserve the perfecto? Also, could the scorekeeper have, judging that the throw actually beat the runner, ruled the play an error on either the pitcher or first baseman to at least preserve a no-hitter? Would this not be included in the human element of the game?
But one thing baseball also recognizes is that some games or moments are more important than others. Not every play during every season has the same importance. For example, extra umpires are added down the foul lines for post-season and All-Star games, and extras are at the park just in case. Regular season games allow for ill or injured umpires to leave the game and go with three. I'll bring this difference of importance into another post coming soon.
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Giants Win Projection Through June 30
June 16 through June 30, 2010:
W 37-28, 92; L 37-29, 91; L 37-30, 89; W 38-30, 91; W 39-30, 92; L 39-31, 90; L 39-32, 89; W 40-32, 90; L 40-33, 89; L 40-34, 88; L 40-35, 86; L 40-36, 85; L 40-37, 84.
W 37-28, 92; L 37-29, 91; L 37-30, 89; W 38-30, 91; W 39-30, 92; L 39-31, 90; L 39-32, 89; W 40-32, 90; L 40-33, 89; L 40-34, 88; L 40-35, 86; L 40-36, 85; L 40-37, 84.
Sunday, June 27, 2010
The Best Retro Uni Night Ever
Last night, probably the best ever turn-back-the-clock night for uniforms took place. Yes, it was 70's retro uniform night at a certain game. Of course, when a baseball fan thinks of the wildest uni's of the 70's, it is immediately clear that such an event could only happen in an interleague contest. And the "best" 70's uniforms in all of baseball were worn by none other than the Oakland A's and the Pittsburgh Pirates. It was also 1970's Joe Rudi replica jersey night in Oakland.
The A's wore their California Gold double-knit polyester pajama pullovers with their gold pants and green stirrup socks, with Kelly green hats and yellow bills. Also typical of the 70's A's, the coaches and managers wore the white hats with the green bills. The official uniform colors used to be "Kelly green, California gold and wedding gown white." The "Swingin' A's" logo was also used. The Pirates wore their black pajama pullover tops, black pants, gold stirrups and those (n)ever classic "cylinder" gold top hats with the three pinstripes. It was pure disco. To compound the look, all the announcers, TV crews, stadium personnel and the like wore afros, "porn star" mustaches and/or comb-around hair-do's. They brought back total homer A's announcer Monty Moore who even brought a cow bell to ring when the A's hit a dinger. The announcers had old fashioned microphones with the giant foam ball pop protectors, and creme-gold type sport coats with wide lapels and the rounded lowercase font "csn" (Comcast Sports Net) letters, reminiscent of the 70's ABC's Wild World of Sports. Even a few turtleneck sweaters and tie-dye t-shirts were seen here and there.
The stats graphics across the TV screen mocked the old plain block yellow letters used back then before the newer computer generated ones. The fans got into the act, too, wearing all the old colors and styles. It must have been fun.
The A's wore their California Gold double-knit polyester pajama pullovers with their gold pants and green stirrup socks, with Kelly green hats and yellow bills. Also typical of the 70's A's, the coaches and managers wore the white hats with the green bills. The official uniform colors used to be "Kelly green, California gold and wedding gown white." The "Swingin' A's" logo was also used. The Pirates wore their black pajama pullover tops, black pants, gold stirrups and those (n)ever classic "cylinder" gold top hats with the three pinstripes. It was pure disco. To compound the look, all the announcers, TV crews, stadium personnel and the like wore afros, "porn star" mustaches and/or comb-around hair-do's. They brought back total homer A's announcer Monty Moore who even brought a cow bell to ring when the A's hit a dinger. The announcers had old fashioned microphones with the giant foam ball pop protectors, and creme-gold type sport coats with wide lapels and the rounded lowercase font "csn" (Comcast Sports Net) letters, reminiscent of the 70's ABC's Wild World of Sports. Even a few turtleneck sweaters and tie-dye t-shirts were seen here and there.
The stats graphics across the TV screen mocked the old plain block yellow letters used back then before the newer computer generated ones. The fans got into the act, too, wearing all the old colors and styles. It must have been fun.
Saturday, June 26, 2010
The Sickening Yankees/Red Sox Media Bias
Okay, the entire world knows there is an extreme Yankees and Red Sox media bias in the world of baseball. These two teams are on every possible nationally televised time slot. And when they play each other, it is even worse. ESPN and FOX are Yanks/Sox lapdogs. You can't get any coverage without hearing many times the info on these two teams as almost all other teams combined. They're always the first scores announced. On and on.
Okay, enough about complaints from somebody who isn't a fan of either team. What I want to do is ask fans of the Yankees and Red Sox if they hate the fact that their own teams are being the target of the media bias. I have a reason for asking, by the way, and it isn't envy. I am a Giants fan and our own history with Barry Bonds gave us our own media bias. Bonds' legendary accomplishments (that kept the Giants as perennial contenders) put us on the map in a huge way. We were on the game of the week all the time, we were on ESPN all the time. Thousands of media members would flood the ballpark every day in search of some stupid, inane piece of trivia about Bonds; his shoelaces, his towel hanging in his locker, the air pressure in his tires. Usual walking routes outside the ballpark were blocked off for some media tent or something. It was never ending.
Starting times for games were constantly being changed because of dictated TV coverage start times. Tickets you bought in February now had different starting times. When the game was nationally televised, our own professional, knowledgeable announcers on our local broadcasts were replaced with ignorant network clowns who knew little more about our team than what they crammed for midterms in their hotel room the night before. They constantly got facts and ideas wrong and couldn't offer in-depth coverage due to the generic national audience. I'm sure the rest of the country hated Bonds and the Giants because of it just like we hate the Yankees and Red Sox. I know that I, and many other Giants fans I talked to, hated the media bias that was supposedly directed in our favor. It just simply wasn't to our advantage as fans.
So, how about it Yankees and Red Sox fans? Do you like the extreme bias? Do you hate it? Do you feed on it? Are you so used to the bias that you aren't even aware of it? Or are you completely clueless that there even is a bias? Do you like the 8:35pm start times on work/school nights? Do you care that the rest of the country is forced to watch you? I'd love to know.
Okay, enough about complaints from somebody who isn't a fan of either team. What I want to do is ask fans of the Yankees and Red Sox if they hate the fact that their own teams are being the target of the media bias. I have a reason for asking, by the way, and it isn't envy. I am a Giants fan and our own history with Barry Bonds gave us our own media bias. Bonds' legendary accomplishments (that kept the Giants as perennial contenders) put us on the map in a huge way. We were on the game of the week all the time, we were on ESPN all the time. Thousands of media members would flood the ballpark every day in search of some stupid, inane piece of trivia about Bonds; his shoelaces, his towel hanging in his locker, the air pressure in his tires. Usual walking routes outside the ballpark were blocked off for some media tent or something. It was never ending.
Starting times for games were constantly being changed because of dictated TV coverage start times. Tickets you bought in February now had different starting times. When the game was nationally televised, our own professional, knowledgeable announcers on our local broadcasts were replaced with ignorant network clowns who knew little more about our team than what they crammed for midterms in their hotel room the night before. They constantly got facts and ideas wrong and couldn't offer in-depth coverage due to the generic national audience. I'm sure the rest of the country hated Bonds and the Giants because of it just like we hate the Yankees and Red Sox. I know that I, and many other Giants fans I talked to, hated the media bias that was supposedly directed in our favor. It just simply wasn't to our advantage as fans.
So, how about it Yankees and Red Sox fans? Do you like the extreme bias? Do you hate it? Do you feed on it? Are you so used to the bias that you aren't even aware of it? Or are you completely clueless that there even is a bias? Do you like the 8:35pm start times on work/school nights? Do you care that the rest of the country is forced to watch you? I'd love to know.
Orange Friday
Another uniform change made this year for the 2010 Giants is that they're wearing orange tops on home Friday games. The uni style and letter font remain the same as the standard uni, but the color is orange. I'm not used to this yet, and the uni's look a bit bold as can be seen by this Giants TV commercial. The Giants wore orange tops as part of a rotating uni (along with white and black tops) back in the '77-'82 time span.
Back in the early 2000's, the Giants wore black jerseys on Friday, both at home and on the road, but these were done away with because they weren't the traditional uni's. Bonds hit his 71st and record breaking home run in a black top. Last night's game between the Giants and Red Sox just didn't look like the Giants vs. Red Sox. The Giants wore their orange, while the Sox wore their blue tops and gray pants.
For several years now, the Giants have had Orange Friday, but it has been the fans who wore orange to the games, including some rad 70's style orange afros here and there. Now the Giants themselves have joined their own promo. The jury is still out.
Back in the early 2000's, the Giants wore black jerseys on Friday, both at home and on the road, but these were done away with because they weren't the traditional uni's. Bonds hit his 71st and record breaking home run in a black top. Last night's game between the Giants and Red Sox just didn't look like the Giants vs. Red Sox. The Giants wore their orange, while the Sox wore their blue tops and gray pants.
For several years now, the Giants have had Orange Friday, but it has been the fans who wore orange to the games, including some rad 70's style orange afros here and there. Now the Giants themselves have joined their own promo. The jury is still out.
Friday, June 25, 2010
A Visit To Petco Park
Petco Park has a unique bleacher arrangement. The seats are stuck to the top of a small concrete wall, and there is grass between rows. The leg room is extra long, so you can actually sit on the grass, picnic style. Just behind the center field fence there is a huge sand box in front of the bleacher seats for the kids to play in. This was perfect for a family with three small boys. Notice our baseball fanatic five year old son in the third picture standing with a foam finger right behind the fence on the left side of the photo. He enjoyed most of the game from there, one of the best seats in the house. His description of the fly ball to deep center field included himself in the story.
Over all, Petco Park is one of the best parks I have ever visited, in terms of beauty, baseball appropriateness and other relevant characteristics. Architecturally, I believe it to be superior to AT&T Park, which is widely viewed as the best of the new parks. Petco isn't on the shores of San Francisco Bay with a grand view of the bridge and East Bay hills, but it is in a beautiful city, and a good downtown. I'm glad the Padres did something different from the now-cookie cutter throwback parks. The brick warehouse building being part of the park is absolutely awesome. The Padres team store is located on the bottom floor. The corner of the building is the left field "foul pole", the foul line taking a 45 degree angle straight into that corner. A ball bouncing left is foul, while one bouncing right is fair. What could be more easy than that?
I enjoyed our time there and will enjoy going back there numerous times in the future. The black and orange Orioles beat the Padres 5-4, even after a bullpen meltdown in the 9th. That helped our black and orange Giants in the race with the Padres. I'll probably post more pictures soon.
Friday, June 18, 2010
Giants Win Projection Through June 15
June 1 through June 15, 2010:
L 27-24, 86; W 28-24, 87; W 29-24, 89; L 29-25, 87; W 30-25, 88; W 31-25, 90; W 32-25, 91; L 32-26, 89; L 32-27, 88; W 33-27, 89; W 34-27, 90; W 35-27, 91; W 36-27, 93; L 36-28, 91.
L 27-24, 86; W 28-24, 87; W 29-24, 89; L 29-25, 87; W 30-25, 88; W 31-25, 90; W 32-25, 91; L 32-26, 89; L 32-27, 88; W 33-27, 89; W 34-27, 90; W 35-27, 91; W 36-27, 93; L 36-28, 91.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Giants Win Projection Through May 31
May 16 through May 31, 2010:
W 21-15, 95; L 21-16, 92; W 22-16, 94; L 22-17, 91; L 22-18, 89; L 22-19, 87; L 22-20, 85; L 22-21, 83; W 23-21, 85; L 23-22, 83; W 24-22, 85; W 25-22, 86; W 26-22, 88; W 27-22, 89; L 27-23, 87.
W 21-15, 95; L 21-16, 92; W 22-16, 94; L 22-17, 91; L 22-18, 89; L 22-19, 87; L 22-20, 85; L 22-21, 83; W 23-21, 85; L 23-22, 83; W 24-22, 85; W 25-22, 86; W 26-22, 88; W 27-22, 89; L 27-23, 87.
Sunday, June 13, 2010
Giants Win Projection Through May 15
May 1 through May 15, 2010:
W 14-9, 99; L 14-10, 95; W 15-10, 97; W 16-10, 100; W 17-10, 102; L 17-11, 98; L 17-12, 95; W 18-12, 97; L 18-13, 94; L 18-14, 91; L 18-15, 88; W 19-15, 91; W 20-15, 93.
W 14-9, 99; L 14-10, 95; W 15-10, 97; W 16-10, 100; W 17-10, 102; L 17-11, 98; L 17-12, 95; W 18-12, 97; L 18-13, 94; L 18-14, 91; L 18-15, 88; W 19-15, 91; W 20-15, 93.
Giants Win Projection Through April 30
April 16 through April 30, 2010:
L 7-3, 113; W 8-3, 118; L 8-4, 108; L 8-5, 100; L 8-6, 93; L 8-7, 86; W 9-7, 91; W 10-7, 95; L 10-8, 90; W 11-8, 94; W 12-8, 97; L 12-9, 93; W 13-9, 96.
L 7-3, 113; W 8-3, 118; L 8-4, 108; L 8-5, 100; L 8-6, 93; L 8-7, 86; W 9-7, 91; W 10-7, 95; L 10-8, 90; W 11-8, 94; W 12-8, 97; L 12-9, 93; W 13-9, 96.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Perfect Blown Call
We've all heard about (and seen!) Armando Galarraga's perfect game and umpire Jim Joyce's blown call with two outs in the ninth inning that took it away. First, that sucks. But this raises, yet again, the debate over instant replay, and how it should be used.
Before I get to instant replay, let me just say that I'm glad that baseball has resorted in the last few years to umpires having a discussion with each other to correct calls just after they are made. This is a huge improvement over letting an obvious bad call go. For those who make a big issue about human error being part of baseball, umpires second-guessing themselves actually affirms the human factor of error, and adds the human factor of wanting to correct ourselves to make us better. So, I'm all for that. I'm not sure if the other umpires were in a position to correct Joyce on the field and on the spot, as they might not have seen the play well enough.
Now, I'm going to ask whether instant replay should be a factor at all in getting the call right. We already have a limited instant replay for home run calls, either whether the ball clears the fence or if it were fair or foul. This system isn't fool proof, as I personally witnessed the instant replay blunder in San Francisco (I was just yards away from the fence when the ball hit) that had the call reversed, creating a pinch-runner and eliminating a player from the game, and I wrote about it here. In my estimation, instant replay should only be used in limited circumstances, as its use can affect the way baseball is played as a game.
We all want to "get it right." But we all also recognize the human element in doing so. Instant replay is no guarantee to getting it right, as the NFL has proven. There are several ideas about how to use instant replay in baseball, with objections as to how it will affect the game. I'll have to write more about this in upcoming posts.
Before I get to instant replay, let me just say that I'm glad that baseball has resorted in the last few years to umpires having a discussion with each other to correct calls just after they are made. This is a huge improvement over letting an obvious bad call go. For those who make a big issue about human error being part of baseball, umpires second-guessing themselves actually affirms the human factor of error, and adds the human factor of wanting to correct ourselves to make us better. So, I'm all for that. I'm not sure if the other umpires were in a position to correct Joyce on the field and on the spot, as they might not have seen the play well enough.
Now, I'm going to ask whether instant replay should be a factor at all in getting the call right. We already have a limited instant replay for home run calls, either whether the ball clears the fence or if it were fair or foul. This system isn't fool proof, as I personally witnessed the instant replay blunder in San Francisco (I was just yards away from the fence when the ball hit) that had the call reversed, creating a pinch-runner and eliminating a player from the game, and I wrote about it here. In my estimation, instant replay should only be used in limited circumstances, as its use can affect the way baseball is played as a game.
We all want to "get it right." But we all also recognize the human element in doing so. Instant replay is no guarantee to getting it right, as the NFL has proven. There are several ideas about how to use instant replay in baseball, with objections as to how it will affect the game. I'll have to write more about this in upcoming posts.
Monday, May 31, 2010
Sunday Hats
This year the Giants are wearing an orange billed cap on Sundays. This appears to be the case both at home and on the road. This is very similar to the hat worn between 1977 and 1982. The interlocking SF logo is slightly different - as in font - from the old cap. This new cap looks a bit odd with the traditional cream uni's, maybe only because we've been so used to solid black for so long. Maybe it's because there's a hesitancy on my part to adopt styles from the 70's.
In any case, these caps look so much better than the patriotic ones the teams are wearing today for Memorial Day. White caps with red bills and a stars-and-stripes logo theme. Giants and Rockies both wearing them. They simply don't go with either uniform.
I still have a 1982 cap from hat day that had the orange bill. I've worn it a few times over the last couple of years. It's old and flimsy and has lost its form. The stitching where the tag was is way off, leaving the tag stump sticking out. Typical of the cheapo hats they used to give away on cap day. Otherwise, it's a way to look retro cool, but it's a real hat, and a real hat is a way to show that you've been a fan all these years.
In any case, these caps look so much better than the patriotic ones the teams are wearing today for Memorial Day. White caps with red bills and a stars-and-stripes logo theme. Giants and Rockies both wearing them. They simply don't go with either uniform.
I still have a 1982 cap from hat day that had the orange bill. I've worn it a few times over the last couple of years. It's old and flimsy and has lost its form. The stitching where the tag was is way off, leaving the tag stump sticking out. Typical of the cheapo hats they used to give away on cap day. Otherwise, it's a way to look retro cool, but it's a real hat, and a real hat is a way to show that you've been a fan all these years.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Giants Uniform Changes for 2010
The Giants have introduced two uniform changes for 2010. First, they're using an orange-billed hat on Sundays, similar to the hat they wore from about 1977 to 1982. Second, they're applying the "Orange Fridays" theme, where fans have been encouraged to wear orange to the Friday games for the last so many years, to their uni tops. They're now wearing orange tops, similar to the ones from the same '77-'82 period, except with the current traditional block letters. Another small change is an optional display of three orange stripes around the upper calf of their black socks for those players who like to show the full sock. I'll write about each of these things a bit more.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Giants Win Projection Through April 15
April 5 through April 14, 2010:
W 1-0, 162; W 2-0, 162; W 3-0, 162; W 4-0, 162; L 5-1, 135; W 6-1, 139; L 6-2, 122; W 7-2, 126.
W 1-0, 162; W 2-0, 162; W 3-0, 162; W 4-0, 162; L 5-1, 135; W 6-1, 139; L 6-2, 122; W 7-2, 126.
Saturday, April 24, 2010
2010 Giants Win Projection
I have been doing a few years worth of Giants Loss Projections ( 2008 and 2009 ) based on their current winning percentage. I've shown their record, day to day, and how many losses that projects to at the end of 162 games. I've posted these results essentially twice a month. Since the Giants had been a losing team for four years, I stated I would continue the loss projection each year until they had a winning year. Well, 2009 was a winning year. So, I'm doing a 2010 win projection. I'll post their projections through April 15 soon, then another after the close of April 30's play.
Monday, April 12, 2010
Baseball Is Back!
I wanted to blog about Opening Day and a few other things last week, but time got the best of me. One thing for sure is that baseball season is here. That means baseball on the radio, TV and in the news and on the net.
My Giants are the last team to be undefeated, and as of tonight are 5-1. I'm really going to try to blog more baseball this season. Hope your team does well, but not as well as mine.
My Giants are the last team to be undefeated, and as of tonight are 5-1. I'm really going to try to blog more baseball this season. Hope your team does well, but not as well as mine.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Giants Baseball Is On The Air!
At 12:05pm today, the first radio game of the year came on the air. Dave Flemming announced the starting lineups in a hurry and turned it over to Jon Miller for the first pitch. Music!
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Pee-wee Carl Yastrzemski and Now Albert Pujols
Last year, our middle son was four, and he played for the Pee-wee Red Sox. He wore number 8, which is Carl Yastrzemski in a Red Sox uniform. This year, at 5, he's with the Pee-wee Cardinals. Today he received his new uniform, and he is number 5. That's Albert Pujols. Okay, so far so good.
Thursday, February 25, 2010
New Marlins Ballpark In 2012
A new ballpark for the Florida Marlins is under construction and scheduled to open for the 2012 season. The park will have a retractable roof and be built on the Orange Bowl site. There is hope for increased attendance due to the new park, but if Pittsburgh is any indication, I'm not going to hold my breath. The Marlins have fans that show up just about World Series time. Will a new stadium work? Is Miami a baseball town?
Nevertheless, it will be good to see the team play in some venue other than a football stadium. At only 37,000 seats, the small crowds won't look as small. It will be yet another park to add to my "need to see" list, which right now consists of all parks I've yet to see along with parks I desire to see again.
Nevertheless, it will be good to see the team play in some venue other than a football stadium. At only 37,000 seats, the small crowds won't look as small. It will be yet another park to add to my "need to see" list, which right now consists of all parks I've yet to see along with parks I desire to see again.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Pitchers And Catchers Mean...
Pitchers and catchers report today. And of course this means...baseball on the radio will soon be here!
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
New Twins Ballpark in 2010
This year yet another new ballpark will open. Minneapolis has built Target Field for the Twins. It looks okay. I say this because the new ballpark rage has gotten old. But, it's another new park that I will want to add to my "visited" collection. For that reason, I like it.
Also, the Metrodome will no longer be of service to baseball. Hooray! The Twinkiedome can now be the home of the Vikings, and we'll never have to wonder again if the Twins blow the air conditioning out for them and in for visiting teams. I never visited the Metrodome, although I walked by it in the off season while in Minneapolis once. I have mixed feelings about not seeing it. I wish I could have seen all those parks that have been replaced in my baseball lifetime, so if Major League baseball is played somewhere, I want to see it.
I'll be looking for the new park on TV sometime in April.
Also, the Metrodome will no longer be of service to baseball. Hooray! The Twinkiedome can now be the home of the Vikings, and we'll never have to wonder again if the Twins blow the air conditioning out for them and in for visiting teams. I never visited the Metrodome, although I walked by it in the off season while in Minneapolis once. I have mixed feelings about not seeing it. I wish I could have seen all those parks that have been replaced in my baseball lifetime, so if Major League baseball is played somewhere, I want to see it.
I'll be looking for the new park on TV sometime in April.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Will Barry Zito Improve?
Barry Zito is entering the middle year of his long term contract. The question is, will he improve? If Zito could rebound to a semblance of his old form, even posting a winning season, the Giants stand to improve as well. He's shown some bright spots over the last two years but hasn't been able to keep it up for an entire year. Assuming Lincecum and Cain can repeat their usual years, a good year from Zito may take a bit more pressure off the lame offense. The Giants could even make the playoffs with a wildcard berth.
I'm not holding my breath, but I am more hopeful for Zito's future than most people seem to be. Here's hoping that Zito can live up to some of his expectations.
I'm not holding my breath, but I am more hopeful for Zito's future than most people seem to be. Here's hoping that Zito can live up to some of his expectations.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Congratulations, Jon Miller
I heard the news that Jon Miller was chosen as the Ford Frick award winner this year. He will be inducted into the broadcaster's wing of baseball's Hall of Fame. Now, Miller is just about the premier broadcaster in baseball. And he is one of my Giants announcers for thirteen seasons now.
It is really a pleasure listening to Miller on the radio. He is surrounded with other good professionals on the Giants broadcasting team. We are blessed here in the Bay Area to have such good announcers. I have listened to other announcers around baseball, both in travelling and in listening to call playbacks on the radio. Also there have been some fairly bad announcers here that have quickly been recycled to other teams. In my estimation, the Giants have one of the top broadcasting teams, thanks in large part to Miller. Jon has a great radio voice, descriptive vocabulary, knows the game, and is great at painting the picture the radio listener needs to follow the game.
Jon Miller has been elected to the Hall in what might be the middle of his career. I'm sure he won't become a slacker because of it, and I look forward to many more seasons of listening to his voice. It sure is a great sound when Spring Training starts. Congratulations, Jon Miller.
It is really a pleasure listening to Miller on the radio. He is surrounded with other good professionals on the Giants broadcasting team. We are blessed here in the Bay Area to have such good announcers. I have listened to other announcers around baseball, both in travelling and in listening to call playbacks on the radio. Also there have been some fairly bad announcers here that have quickly been recycled to other teams. In my estimation, the Giants have one of the top broadcasting teams, thanks in large part to Miller. Jon has a great radio voice, descriptive vocabulary, knows the game, and is great at painting the picture the radio listener needs to follow the game.
Jon Miller has been elected to the Hall in what might be the middle of his career. I'm sure he won't become a slacker because of it, and I look forward to many more seasons of listening to his voice. It sure is a great sound when Spring Training starts. Congratulations, Jon Miller.
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Molina Again?
The Giants re-signed catcher Benjie Molina. In what is a mixed-feelings bag, I'm wondering what is done that will help the team win the World Series. His offensive numbers were down last year and I'm not sure we can see a repeat of '08. Even with good common offensive numbers (avg., HR, RBI) he is still the slowest player in baseball and his on-base percentage is horrific.
He handles the staff well, but could another catcher do the same? Is Molina's signing a hint that the Giants think Buster Posey isn't ready for prime time for a few more years? I don't see the Giants activity in the off season as indicative that they're ready to push for the title just yet. Wait til next year...again?
He handles the staff well, but could another catcher do the same? Is Molina's signing a hint that the Giants think Buster Posey isn't ready for prime time for a few more years? I don't see the Giants activity in the off season as indicative that they're ready to push for the title just yet. Wait til next year...again?
Friday, January 15, 2010
Steroids and The Hall of Fame
Grant at McCovey Chronicles pens his opinion on the way the steroids issue has affected how we view the Hall of Fame. His opinion is that using players shouldn't be banned, but the steroid issue, which is complex, should be taken into consideration.
As a side note, the picture he uses is the one I mentioned in my last post showing Barry Bonds, of all players.
As a side note, the picture he uses is the one I mentioned in my last post showing Barry Bonds, of all players.
Labels:
Hall of Fame,
Link,
Link FTB,
Mark McGwire,
McCovey Chronicles,
Steroids
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Big Macs Now Trans-Fat AND Roid Free
Okay, when the Mark McGwire steroid admission story broke, the photo used on my Yahoo homepage showed McGwire at the bag at first holding a runner on. The runner was in the picture. Purely by coincidence, and no other fate, the runner was Barry Bonds.
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Congratulations Andre Dawson
Congratulations, Andre Dawson. Newest electee into the Hall of Fame. He's the only one this year to be elected. I'm guessing Bert Blyleven and Roberto Alomar will make it next year.
I was just watching a video of Dawson clips. He hit a triple in Houston, and Jose Cruz with his big mop was chasing the ball down at the fence in that rainbow uni. Man, those guys should be in the Hall of Fame just for hair and uniforms!
I was just watching a video of Dawson clips. He hit a triple in Houston, and Jose Cruz with his big mop was chasing the ball down at the fence in that rainbow uni. Man, those guys should be in the Hall of Fame just for hair and uniforms!
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Foul Balls and Fair
I've said it before, but I want to do a series here about the foul balls and home runs that I've caught over the years. My first foul ball came in 1982, and my most recent was just this year. Home run balls are always special, too, especially when you get three in one game. Stay tuned.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)